SEOR SBRT-SG stereotactic body radiation therapy consensus guidelines for non-spine bone metastasis.

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. The clinical advantages of SBRT include good pain control and high local control rates, although only limited data are available. The Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) SBRT group recently convened a task force of experts in the field to address key questions related to SBRT for NSBM, including treatment indications, planning, techniques, and dose fractionation. The task force reviewed the available literature to develop evidence-based recommendations for the safe application of NSBM SBRT and to standardize and optimize SBRT processes. The present document provides a comprehensive analysis of the available data, including ongoing clinical trials and controversies, providing clinically applicable recommendations.

Long-term outcomes of spinal SBRT. Is it important to select the treatment time?

PURPOSE: SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) is widely used as a curative treatment in tumoral lesions and has become a fundamental tool for the treatment of spine metastasis. In this study, we present survival and toxicity outcomes of spine SBRT after a 2-year follow-up. METHODS/PATIENTS: Data from spine SBRT treatments performed at our institution between March 2012 and February 2020 was collected. Medical records, including demographic, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics were reviewed. Patient follow-up included clinical evaluation, imaging, and blood tests. Toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: We analyzed 73 consecutive spine SBRT treatments in 60 patients. 39.7% of the cases had primary breast cancer and 23.3% had prostate cancer. Most cases (87.7%) were treated with a single SBRT fraction of 16 Gy. Median follow-up was 26.1 months (range 1.7-78.6), and 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.9% and 84.2%, respectively. Local control (LC) rates at 1- and 2-years were 76.3% and 70.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified histology as a prognostic factor for both OS and LC. Patients who underwent spine SBRT 6 months after the spinal lesion diagnosis had LC at 2 years of 88%, vs 61.7% for those who underwent SBRT before this period. No grade III or higher toxicity was reported. The vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rate was 4.1%. CONCLUSION: Spine SBRT at our institution showed a 2-year LC of 70.6%, without G3 toxicities. Delaying SBRT at least 6 months to administer systemic treatment was related to an improvement in local control.

SEOR SBRT-SG survey on SRS/SBRT dose prescription criteria in Spain

Aim Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are essential tools in radiation oncology. In Spain, the use of these techniques continues to grow as older linear accelerators (linacs) are replaced with modern equipment. However, little is known about inter-centre variability in prescription and dose heterogeneity limits. Consequently, the SBRT-Spanish Task Group (SBRT-SG) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) has undertaken an initiative to assess prescription and homogeneity in SRS/SBRT treatment. In the present study, we surveyed radiation oncology (RO) departments to obtain a realistic overview of prescription methods used for SBRT and SRS treatment in Spain. Methods A brief survey was developed and sent to 34 RO departments in Spain, mostly those who are members of the SEOR SBRT-SG. The survey contained seven questions about the specific prescription mode, dose distribution heterogeneity limits, prescription strategies according to SRS/SBRT type, and the use of IMRT–VMAT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy–Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy). Results Responses were received from 29 centres. Most centres (59%) used the prescription criteria D95% ≥ 100%. Accepted dose heterogeneity was wide, ranging from 107 to 200%. Most centres used IMRT–VMAT (93%). Conclusions This survey about SRS/SBRT prescription and dose heterogeneity has evidenced substantial inter-centre variability in prescription criteria, particularly for intended and accepted dose heterogeneity. These differences could potentially influence the mean planning target volume dose and its correlation with treatment outcomes. The findings presented here will be used by the SEOR SBRT-SG to develop recommendations for SRS/SBRT dose prescription and heterogeneity (AU)

Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Early stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Is there Enough Data to Make a Recommendation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Health reported quality of life test (HRQOLT) in oncologic patients has become a major concern. Early stage in non-small cell lung cancer has two options for treatment in fragile population: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Which option should be recommended in daily clinical practice remains a challenging question. The current review is addressing this concern. Among 1256 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria and 2034 patients were analyzed treated either with VATS or SBRT. Eleven manuscripts in SBRT, five VATS studies, and three reviews were summarized in the present review. In fragile population, SBRT seems to be a valuable option of treatment with minor or no changes in HRQOLT. However, baseline quality of life status or geriatric assessment tools before treatment could be a good strategy to select appropriate population for undergoing SBRT or surgery. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: In this paper, we present a systematic review where we compare the current evidence of two options for treatment in fragile population: SBRT and VATS.

SEOR SBRT-SG survey on SRS/SBRT dose prescription criteria in Spain.

AIM: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are essential tools in radiation oncology. In Spain, the use of these techniques continues to grow as older linear accelerators (linacs) are replaced with modern equipment. However, little is known about inter-centre variability in prescription and dose heterogeneity limits. Consequently, the SBRT-Spanish Task Group (SBRT-SG) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) has undertaken an initiative to assess prescription and homogeneity in SRS/SBRT treatment. In the present study, we surveyed radiation oncology (RO) departments to obtain a realistic overview of prescription methods used for SBRT and SRS treatment in Spain. METHODS: A brief survey was developed and sent to 34 RO departments in Spain, mostly those who are members of the SEOR SBRT-SG. The survey contained seven questions about the specific prescription mode, dose distribution heterogeneity limits, prescription strategies according to SRS/SBRT type, and the use of IMRT-VMAT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy-Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy). RESULTS: Responses were received from 29 centres. Most centres (59%) used the prescription criteria D95% ≥ 100%. Accepted dose heterogeneity was wide, ranging from 107 to 200%. Most centres used IMRT-VMAT (93%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey about SRS/SBRT prescription and dose heterogeneity has evidenced substantial inter-centre variability in prescription criteria, particularly for intended and accepted dose heterogeneity. These differences could potentially influence the mean planning target volume dose and its correlation with treatment outcomes. The findings presented here will be used by the SEOR SBRT-SG to develop recommendations for SRS/SBRT dose prescription and heterogeneity.

Successful treatment of glomus jugulare tumours with gamma knife radiosurgery: clinical and physical aspects of management and review of the literature

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of treatment and early outcomes for patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR), with or without surgical resection, for glomus jugulare tumours. METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2008, 10 patients with glomus jugulare tumours were treated with GKR. Eight had prior surgical resection, seven subtotal resection and one total resection. In two cases GKR was the only definitive therapy. Baseline neurological deficits were prospectively recorded and present in 90% prior to GKR. The median tumour size and volume were 4 cc (0.7-10.9 cc). The median marginal tumour dose was 14 Gy (12-16 Gy). Clinical and radiographic outcomes are reported with a median follow-up of 9.7 months. RESULTS: Stereotactic frame placement allowed treatment of all 10 lesions, although 3-point fixation was sometimes required to avoid collisions. No patients developed worsening of symptoms or new neurological complaints after GKR; symptom relief was achieved in 50% of cases. No cases of clinical or radiographic progression were identified. Radiographically, 80% of lesions were stable and 20% showed significant shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS: GKR is an excellent option for patients with glomus jugulare tumours after complete or subtotal resection or at recurrence. Appropriately planned frame placement allows successful treatment delivery without difficulty. GKR improved symptoms, prevented neurological progression and achieved radiographic stability or regression in all cases (AU)

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for occipital condyle metastasis

We present a 45 year old female with right occipital condylar metastases who was treated at William Beaumont Hospital in the Gamma Knife Unit. Clinical results at 17 months follow-up and MRI are expose (AU)

Gamma Knife radiosurgery as a primary treatment option for solitary brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma.

We present three patients with brain metastasis cases from ovarian carcinoma (BMOC) treated at William Beaumont Hospital with a median follwow-up of 77 months and a mean survival after brain involvement of 23.66 months (range 5-44). Clinical and physical aspects are presented. Between December 2006 and August 2008, three cases of BMOC were treated using Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery. All patients had FIGO Stage III primary disease at initial diagnosis. Treatment sequences and features are described. GK achieves excellent local control of BMOC. Other parameters could be considered as biologically effective.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery as a primary treatment option for solitary brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma

We present three patients with brain metastasis cases from ovarian carcinoma (BMOC) treated at William Beaumont Hospital with a median follwow-up of 77 months and a mean survival after brain involvement of 23.66 months (range 5-44). Clinical and physical aspects are presented. Between December 2006 and August 2008, three cases of BMOC were treated using Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery. All patients had FIGO Stage III primary disease at initial diagnosis. Treatment sequences and features are described. GK achieves excellent local control of BMOC. Other parameters could be considered as biologically effective (AU)

Correspondencia entre las edades osea y dentaria

Se estudiaron las edades ósea y dentaria en 32 niños de ambos sexos, con edades de 6 años, más o menos 5 meses, sin distición de razas. Se tomó como criterio de exclusión la presencia de enfermedades endocrinas o severas, de duración prolongada. Se evaluó la edad ósea por el método TW2 y la dentaria por el Dermijian. Los datos obtenidos fueron sometidos a análisis estadísticos, con la finalidad de comprobar la confiabilidad de estos métodos para evaluar la maduración biológica, así como la correspondencia entre madurez ósea y dentaria. Se comprobó la existencia de una correlación muy altamente significativa entre ambas edades. La maduración esquelética y la dental reflejan adecuadamente la maduración biológica del individuo, por lo que puede utilizarse cualquiera de las dos de forma efectiva